<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>tech news blog</title>
	<link>http://www.intechnews.com</link>
	<description>technology blog , gadgets, gaming , hdtv, gps, intech news,wii, ps3, xbox</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 04:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>OLPC XO officially gets Windows XP, children of the world to be assimilated</title>
		<link>http://www.intechnews.com/2008/05/16/olpc-xo-officially-gets-windows-xp-children-of-the-world-to-be-assimilated-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intechnews.com/2008/05/16/olpc-xo-officially-gets-windows-xp-children-of-the-world-to-be-assimilated-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 04:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Gaming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intechnews.com/2008/05/16/olpc-xo-officially-gets-windows-xp-children-of-the-world-to-be-assimilated-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OLPC XO officially gets Windows XP, children of the world to be assimilated
Filed under: Laptops

 It&#8217;s been a controversial decision, but it looks like the OLPC XO has completed its transition from revolutionary education project to just another tiny Windows laptop with a useless keyboard &#8212; albeit one with a pleasantly whimsical design. Yep, it&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.engadget.com/~r/weblogsinc/engadget/~3/291281871/" >OLPC XO officially gets Windows XP, children of the world to be assimilated</a>
<p>Filed under: <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/" rel="tag">Laptops</a></p>
<div align="center"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2008/may08/05-15MSOLPCPR.mspx"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/05/5-15-08-xpolpc.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
<p> It&#8217;s been a <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/25/walter-bender-speaks-out-about-leaving-olpc-de-emphasis-of-radi/">controversial</a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/21/olpc-security-chief-resigns-cites-ethical-concerns-as-final-str/">decision</a>, but it looks like the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/olpcxo">OLPC XO</a> has completed its <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/21/olpc-head-of-software-and-content-resigns-possibly-over-transit/">transition</a> from revolutionary education project to just another <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://engadget.com/tag/eeepc">tiny</a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://engadget.com/tag/wind">Windows</a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://engadget.com/tag/cloudbook">laptop</a> with a <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/20/are-olpc-xo-keyboards-having-widespread-problems/">useless keyboard</a> &#8212; albeit one with a pleasantly whimsical design. Yep, it&#8217;s official: Microsoft and OLPC just put out a joint press release saying that XP-loaded XOs will be available starting in August or September, with some countries to get the machines as soon as next month. Users will get all the regular functionality of XP &#8212; it&#8217;s basically the same build as on the Eee and other ultraportables &#8212; but Microsoft&#8217;s spent over a year developing specialized drivers for the XO&#8217;s various features like e-book mode, the writing pad, and camera. (We&#8217;re pretty certain that doesn&#8217;t include mesh networking, but WiFi is supported.) XP is too big for the built-in 1GB flash chip, so it&#8217;ll come preloaded on a 2GB SD card, leaving just about 1.5GB free total for apps and media. It seems like Microsoft is thrilled about this partnership, but it&#8217;s a not going to make NickNeg&#8217;s <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/03/olpc-reshuffles-gets-new-president-and-coo/">search for new vision</a> at the top any easier. As for Sugar? You&#8217;ll still be able to get it, but we have a sinking feeling about its future. Demo video after the break.
<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/olpc-xo-officially-gets-windows-xp-children-of-the-world-to-be/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>OLPC XO officially gets Windows XP, children of the world to be assimilated</em></a></p>
<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6>
<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href=http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2008/may08/05-15MSOLPCPR.mspx>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/olpc-xo-officially-gets-windows-xp-children-of-the-world-to-be/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1197034/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/olpc-xo-officially-gets-windows-xp-children-of-the-world-to-be/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>
<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.engadget.com/~a/weblogsinc/engadget?a=n41cT3"><img src="http://feeds.engadget.com/~a/weblogsinc/engadget?i=n41cT3" border="0"></img></a></p>
<div class="feedflare"> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.engadget.com/~f/weblogsinc/engadget?a=F5FHSh"><img src="http://feeds.engadget.com/~f/weblogsinc/engadget?i=F5FHSh" border="0"></img></a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.engadget.com/~f/weblogsinc/engadget?a=dbOSwh"><img src="http://feeds.engadget.com/~f/weblogsinc/engadget?i=dbOSwh" border="0"></img></a> </div>
<p><img src="http://feeds.engadget.com/~r/weblogsinc/engadget/~4/291281871" height="1" width="1"/></p>
<p class="akst_link"><a href="http://www.intechnews.com/?p=19165&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_19165" class="akst_share_link" rel="nofollow">Share This</a>
</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intechnews.com/2008/05/16/olpc-xo-officially-gets-windows-xp-children-of-the-world-to-be-assimilated-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EFF&#8217;s Guide to Border Laptop Searches [Laptops]</title>
		<link>http://www.intechnews.com/2008/05/16/effs-guide-to-border-laptop-searches-laptops/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intechnews.com/2008/05/16/effs-guide-to-border-laptop-searches-laptops/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 03:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Technology News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intechnews.com/2008/05/16/effs-guide-to-border-laptop-searches-laptops/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[EFF&#8217;s Guide to Border Laptop Searches [Laptops]   			


You already knew that customs officials can search your laptop if they feel like it, detaining you if you refuse, but what can you do to protect yourself from random dudes checking out your vacation pics? The EFF has some tips. There&#8217;s having multiple encrypted partitions, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~3/291963461/effs-guide-to-border-laptop-searches 			" >EFF&#8217;s Guide to Border Laptop Searches [Laptops]   			</a><br /><body>
<div>
<div>
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/04/dellspread%20copy.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"    style="display:block;display:block;"/>You already knew that customs officials can <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://gizmodo.com/383649/border-agents-can-frisk-your-laptop-and-gadgets-without-cause">search your laptop if they feel like it</a>, detaining you if you refuse, but what can you do to protect yourself from random dudes checking out your vacation pics? The EFF has some tips. There&#8217;s having multiple encrypted partitions, having secure passwords, shutting off your machine before searches and destroying naughty stuff semi-permanently with shredding applications. Hit up the link for more privacy tips. [<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2008/05/border-search-answers">EFF</a>]</p>
</p></div>
</p></div>
<p> </body>  <br style="clear: both;"/>       <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=c793b13fc9c5f1ccc699fdfddeee2ad4"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=c793b13fc9c5f1ccc699fdfddeee2ad4"/></a>   <img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=c793b13fc9c5f1ccc699fdfddeee2ad4" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>
<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~a/gizmodo/full?a=UuWESu"><img src="http://feeds.gawker.com/~a/gizmodo/full?i=UuWESu" border="0"></img></a></p>
<div class="feedflare"> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?a=aSmBnH"><img src="http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?i=aSmBnH" border="0"></img></a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?a=JfNFsH"><img src="http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?i=JfNFsH" border="0"></img></a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?a=Dj6Ksh"><img src="http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?i=Dj6Ksh" border="0"></img></a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?a=WaieQh"><img src="http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?i=WaieQh" border="0"></img></a> </div>
<p><img src="http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~4/291963461" height="1" width="1"/>  			</p>
<p class="akst_link"><a href="http://www.intechnews.com/?p=19164&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_19164" class="akst_share_link" rel="nofollow">Share This</a>
</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intechnews.com/2008/05/16/effs-guide-to-border-laptop-searches-laptops/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Philips working on a 3-inch touchscreen Xenium X-Connect?</title>
		<link>http://www.intechnews.com/2008/05/16/philips-working-on-a-3-inch-touchscreen-xenium-x-connect/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intechnews.com/2008/05/16/philips-working-on-a-3-inch-touchscreen-xenium-x-connect/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 02:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Technology News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intechnews.com/2008/05/16/philips-working-on-a-3-inch-touchscreen-xenium-x-connect/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Philips working on a 3-inch touchscreen Xenium X-Connect?
Filed under: Cellphones, GPS

 A couple things you should know about this purported Philips Xenium X-Connect before churning your gadget juices through the emotional Osterizer. First, it&#8217;s clearly a product rendering. Second, Philips Xenium cellphones are primarily found in Asia Pacific region &#8212; as such, a European or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/13/philips-working-on-a-3-inch-touchscreen-xenium-x-connect/" >Philips working on a 3-inch touchscreen Xenium X-Connect?</a>
<p>Filed under: <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag">Cellphones</a>, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.engadget.com/category/gps/" rel="tag">GPS</a></p>
<div align="center"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://forum.telefonino.net/showthread.php?t=420795"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/05/philips-xenium-x-connect.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
<p> A couple things you should know about this purported Philips Xenium X-Connect before churning your gadget juices through the emotional Osterizer. First, it&#8217;s clearly a product rendering. Second, Philips <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/tag/xenium">Xenium</a> cellphones are primarily found in Asia Pacific region &#8212; as such, a European or North American launch is likely out of the question. If the X-Connect is the real-deal, however, here&#8217;s what we&#8217;ll be missing: Windows Mobile 6, 3G UMTS/HSDPA radios, GPS receiver, AA/AAA battery backup, microSD slot, and Bluetooth 2.0 all powered by a 624MHz Intel processor beneath a 3.0-inch (presumably touchscreen) display. Still, as a broadly positioned &#8220;communication device,&#8221; maybe we&#8217;ll see Philips reach out to different geographies this time around.</p>
<p><strong>Update</strong>: Oh snap, this thing sure looks like the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/07/philips-new-xenium-800-touchscreen-phone-leaks-out/">Xenium 800</a>.</p>
<p>[Via <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://totouch.net/archives/285">ToTouch</a>, Thanks Giovanni]<br />
<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6>
<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href=http://forum.telefonino.net/showthread.php?t=420795>Read</a></p>
<p class="akst_link"><a href="http://www.intechnews.com/?p=19163&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_19163" class="akst_share_link" rel="nofollow">Share This</a>
</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intechnews.com/2008/05/16/philips-working-on-a-3-inch-touchscreen-xenium-x-connect/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Animatronic Wall-E Entertains Guests At Disneyland, Charges $5 For a Popsicle [Robots]</title>
		<link>http://www.intechnews.com/2008/05/16/animatronic-wall-e-entertains-guests-at-disneyland-charges-5-for-a-popsicle-robots/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intechnews.com/2008/05/16/animatronic-wall-e-entertains-guests-at-disneyland-charges-5-for-a-popsicle-robots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 00:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intechnews.com/2008/05/16/animatronic-wall-e-entertains-guests-at-disneyland-charges-5-for-a-popsicle-robots/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Animatronic Wall-E Entertains Guests At Disneyland, Charges $5 For a Popsicle [Robots]   			



	What&#8217;s even better than a Wall-E robot toy made by WowWee? A Wall-E robot toy made by the animatronic people at Disney. This Wall-E robot is supposed to roam around Disneyland/Disney World entertaining patrons, but got spotted on the streets of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~3/291867832/animatronic-wall e-entertains-guests-at-disneyland-charges-5-for-a-popsicle 			" >Animatronic Wall-E Entertains Guests At Disneyland, Charges $5 For a Popsicle [Robots]   			</a>
<p><object width="494" height="372">
<param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" />
<param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" />
<param name="movie" value="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=1014358&amp;server=www.vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" />	<embed src="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=1014358&amp;server=www.vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="494" height="372"></embed></object>What&#8217;s even better than a Wall-E robot toy made by <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.gizmodo.com/tag/wowwee">WowWee</a>? A Wall-E robot toy made by the animatronic people at Disney. This Wall-E robot is supposed to roam around Disneyland/Disney World entertaining patrons, but got spotted on the streets of LA panhandling and glad-handing for cash. You know who else can say their name? Timmy from <i>South Park</i>. Wall-E! [<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/05/14/must-watch-animatronic-wall-e-spotted-in-la/?=rssfeed">Slashfilm</a>]</p>
</param></param></param> <br style="clear: both;"/>       <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=14566287c58428e331e5108443924384"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=14566287c58428e331e5108443924384"/></a>   <img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=14566287c58428e331e5108443924384" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>
<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~a/gizmodo/full?a=vHweZi"><img src="http://feeds.gawker.com/~a/gizmodo/full?i=vHweZi" border="0"></img></a></p>
<div class="feedflare"> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?a=NkLZqH"><img src="http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?i=NkLZqH" border="0"></img></a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?a=Vm2kgH"><img src="http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?i=Vm2kgH" border="0"></img></a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?a=Oz9jIh"><img src="http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?i=Oz9jIh" border="0"></img></a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?a=al8QYh"><img src="http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?i=al8QYh" border="0"></img></a> </div>
<p><img src="http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~4/291867832" height="1" width="1"/>  			</p>
<p class="akst_link"><a href="http://www.intechnews.com/?p=19162&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_19162" class="akst_share_link" rel="nofollow">Share This</a>
</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intechnews.com/2008/05/16/animatronic-wall-e-entertains-guests-at-disneyland-charges-5-for-a-popsicle-robots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Samsung&#8217;s 12.1-inch OLED laptop concept makes us swoon</title>
		<link>http://www.intechnews.com/2008/05/16/samsungs-121-inch-oled-laptop-concept-makes-us-swoon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intechnews.com/2008/05/16/samsungs-121-inch-oled-laptop-concept-makes-us-swoon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 22:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intechnews.com/2008/05/16/samsungs-121-inch-oled-laptop-concept-makes-us-swoon/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Samsung&#8217;s 12.1-inch OLED laptop concept makes us swoon
Filed under: Displays, Laptops

 As much as we would loath typing on that touch-sensitive, rigid keyboard, we&#8217;re definitely geek-smitten by this ultra-thin, AMOLED laptop concept from Samsung SDI &#8212; Sammy&#8217;s display division. 12.1-inches and 1,280 x 768 resolution with infinite contrast? We&#8217;ll take two&#8230; just as soon as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.engadget.com/~r/weblogsinc/engadget/~3/291466023/" >Samsung&#8217;s 12.1-inch OLED laptop concept makes us swoon</a>
<p>Filed under: <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.engadget.com/category/displays/" rel="tag">Displays</a>, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/" rel="tag">Laptops</a></p>
<div align="center"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://64.233.179.104/translate_c?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.samsung.co.kr%2Fnews%2Fbiz_view.jsp%3Fcontentid%3D119911&amp;langpair=ko%7Cen&amp;hl=en&amp;ie=UTF8"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/05/080516_sdi.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
<p> As much as we would loath typing on that touch-sensitive, rigid keyboard, we&#8217;re definitely geek-smitten by this ultra-thin, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/amoled">AMOLED</a> laptop concept from Samsung SDI &#8212; Sammy&#8217;s display division. 12.1-inches and 1,280 x 768 resolution with infinite contrast? We&#8217;ll take two&#8230; just as soon as someone can explain the extra panel around back. With Samsung projecting <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/29/samsung-lays-out-oled-roadmap/">14- to 15.4-inch OLED laptops in 2009</a>, this might come sooner than you think.<br />
<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6>
<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href=http://64.233.179.104/translate_c?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.samsung.co.kr%2Fnews%2Fbiz_view.jsp%3Fcontentid%3D119911&amp;langpair=ko%7Cen&amp;hl=en&amp;ie=UTF8>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/16/samsungs-12-1-inch-oled-laptop-makes-us-swoon/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1197240/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/16/samsungs-12-1-inch-oled-laptop-makes-us-swoon/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>
<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.engadget.com/~a/weblogsinc/engadget?a=GN4cKF"><img src="http://feeds.engadget.com/~a/weblogsinc/engadget?i=GN4cKF" border="0"></img></a></p>
<div class="feedflare"> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.engadget.com/~f/weblogsinc/engadget?a=F4g7uh"><img src="http://feeds.engadget.com/~f/weblogsinc/engadget?i=F4g7uh" border="0"></img></a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.engadget.com/~f/weblogsinc/engadget?a=jRQ5Uh"><img src="http://feeds.engadget.com/~f/weblogsinc/engadget?i=jRQ5Uh" border="0"></img></a> </div>
<p><img src="http://feeds.engadget.com/~r/weblogsinc/engadget/~4/291466023" height="1" width="1"/></p>
<p class="akst_link"><a href="http://www.intechnews.com/?p=19161&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_19161" class="akst_share_link" rel="nofollow">Share This</a>
</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intechnews.com/2008/05/16/samsungs-121-inch-oled-laptop-concept-makes-us-swoon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AT&#038;T says &#8220;iPhone Black&#8221; means nothing, gunman acted alone</title>
		<link>http://www.intechnews.com/2008/05/16/att-says-iphone-black-means-nothing-gunman-acted-alone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intechnews.com/2008/05/16/att-says-iphone-black-means-nothing-gunman-acted-alone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 21:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Technology News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intechnews.com/2008/05/16/att-says-iphone-black-means-nothing-gunman-acted-alone/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AT&#038;T says &#8220;iPhone Black&#8221; means nothing, gunman acted alone
Filed under: Cellphones, Handhelds

 We&#8217;ve just received an official statement from AT&#038;T regarding the presence of an &#8220;iPhone Black&#8221; on its model selector earlier today: &#8220;The reference to &#8216;iPhone Black&#8217; was simply a temporary placeholder used over the weekend for a scheduled catalog update. It was meant [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/12/atandt-says-iphone-black-means-nothing-gunman-acted-alone/" >AT&#038;T says &#8220;iPhone Black&#8221; means nothing, gunman acted alone</a>
<p>Filed under: <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag">Cellphones</a>, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.engadget.com/category/handhelds/" rel="tag">Handhelds</a></p>
<div align="center"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/media/2008/05/iphone-black-att.jpg" alt="" /></div>
<p> We&#8217;ve just received an official statement from AT&#038;T regarding the presence of an &#8220;iPhone Black&#8221; <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/05/12/atandt-listing-iphone-black-model-o2-gets-the-original-back-in/">on its model selector</a> earlier today: &#8220;The reference to &#8216;iPhone Black&#8217; was simply a temporary placeholder used over the weekend for a scheduled catalog update. It was meant to temporarily distinguish the various iPhone models-4GB, 8GB and 16GB-but was never reassigned. We&#8217;re changing the site now.&#8221; Makes total sense, right? Three models of iPhone, two placeholders: iPhone and iPhone Black. You know, because &#8220;Black&#8221; has so much to do with memory capacity, and is easier to remember than 4, 8, or 16GB &#8212; never mind the fact that we have <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/25/the-second-gen-iphone-3g-gps-only-slightly-thicker/">good intel</a> suggesting that the next-gen device is glossy black.</p>
<p>Also, AT&#038;T, we know those cigarettes are yours, so you can stop telling us you were &#8220;just carrying them for a friend.&#8221; We&#8217;re not stupid, you know.<br />
<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6>
<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/12/atandt-says-iphone-black-means-nothing-gunman-acted-alone/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a></p>
<p class="akst_link"><a href="http://www.intechnews.com/?p=19160&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_19160" class="akst_share_link" rel="nofollow">Share This</a>
</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intechnews.com/2008/05/16/att-says-iphone-black-means-nothing-gunman-acted-alone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Motion Pro II Racing Simulator in Action, Still Cause for Divorce [Racing Simulation]</title>
		<link>http://www.intechnews.com/2008/05/16/motion-pro-ii-racing-simulator-in-action-still-cause-for-divorce-racing-simulation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intechnews.com/2008/05/16/motion-pro-ii-racing-simulator-in-action-still-cause-for-divorce-racing-simulation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 20:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Gaming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intechnews.com/2008/05/16/motion-pro-ii-racing-simulator-in-action-still-cause-for-divorce-racing-simulation/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Motion Pro II Racing Simulator in Action, Still Cause for Divorce [Racing Simulation]   			


 newVideoPlayer("mpsii2_gizmodo.flv", 494, 349,""); Remember yesterday&#8217;s drooltastic Motion Pro II racing simulator? Here&#8217;s how it works and how much it costs. We talked with Chris Considine&#8212;CXC Simulations head honcho&#8212;who tells us that yes, people actually buy these things even if [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~3/291831649/motion-pro-ii-racing-simulator-in-action-still-cause-for-divorce 			" >Motion Pro II Racing Simulator in Action, Still Cause for Divorce [Racing Simulation]   			</a><br /><body>
<div>
<div>
<p><script type="text/javascript"> newVideoPlayer("mpsii2_gizmodo.flv", 494, 349,""); </script><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/stills/mpsii2_gizmodo.flv.jpg"     style="display:block;display:block;display: none;"/>Remember yesterday&#8217;s <i>drooltastic</i> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://gizmodo.com/390698/motion+pro-ii-racing-simulator-blows-minds-budgets-verdict-must-have-prepare-divorce-papers">Motion Pro II racing simulator</a>? Here&#8217;s how it works and how much it costs. We talked with Chris Considine&mdash;CXC Simulations head honcho&mdash;who tells us that yes, people actually buy these things even if they cost more than a car: the Motion Pro II starts at $25,995, but he said that a client spent <i>$45,000</i> on one, after add-ons. See the complete shopping list&mdash;and high definition pictures from a real system&mdash;after the jump.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"> galleryPost(\'mpsii2\', 9, \'\'); </script></p>
<p>Base model: $25,995 (one screen)</p>
<p><b>Add-ons</b></p>
<p>Panoramic display system: $12,995<br /> Six-speed gated shifter and progressive clutch upgrade: $1,049.95<br /> Sequential shifter and hand brake: $1,049.95<br /> Mobility System: $529.95<br /> Carbon fiber bodywork kit: $1,799.95<br /> Advanced on-site setup and training: $2,995</p>
<p>The other options, like the custom paint for the bodywork, are listed as &#8220;Call.&#8221; And then you have to add the software, like Rfactor for $450 or Race for $195. Too expensive to buy? You can rent one: six hours for $1,400 or a week for $12,200, plus two operators at $750 for half a day. And shipping. [<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.cxcsimulations.com/products/mps2/index.html">CXC Simulations</a>&mdash;full video at <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://insidesimracing.tv/index.php?option=com_content&#038;task=view&#038;id=54&#038;Itemid=163">Inside Sim Racing</a>]</p>
</p></div>
</p></div>
<p> </body>  <br style="clear: both;"/>   <img alt="" style="border: 0; height:1px; width:1px;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?i=d8763cc13588b3a97768d1b6488ccde3" height="1" width="1"/> <img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=d8763cc13588b3a97768d1b6488ccde3" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>
<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~a/gizmodo/full?a=Frt2mP"><img src="http://feeds.gawker.com/~a/gizmodo/full?i=Frt2mP" border="0"></img></a></p>
<div class="feedflare"> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?a=Nyj7qH"><img src="http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?i=Nyj7qH" border="0"></img></a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?a=Pf0gyH"><img src="http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?i=Pf0gyH" border="0"></img></a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?a=blg9lh"><img src="http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?i=blg9lh" border="0"></img></a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?a=oCEZah"><img src="http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?i=oCEZah" border="0"></img></a> </div>
<p><img src="http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~4/291831649" height="1" width="1"/>  			</p>
<p class="akst_link"><a href="http://www.intechnews.com/?p=19159&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_19159" class="akst_share_link" rel="nofollow">Share This</a>
</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intechnews.com/2008/05/16/motion-pro-ii-racing-simulator-in-action-still-cause-for-divorce-racing-simulation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Atom-Based Asus Eee PC 901 Ships June 3 With Bluetooth [Rumor]</title>
		<link>http://www.intechnews.com/2008/05/16/atom-based-asus-eee-pc-901-ships-june-3-with-bluetooth-rumor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intechnews.com/2008/05/16/atom-based-asus-eee-pc-901-ships-june-3-with-bluetooth-rumor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 16:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intechnews.com/2008/05/16/atom-based-asus-eee-pc-901-ships-june-3-with-bluetooth-rumor/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Atom-Based Asus Eee PC 901 Ships June 3 With Bluetooth [Rumor]   			


Digitimes is reporting that the Atom-based Asus Eee PC 901 that we got a peek at the other day is set to ship on June 3. And it looks like the cosmetic enhancements (like the metal accents) aren&#8217;t the only bit of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~3/291661045/atom based-asus-eee-pc-901-ships-june-3-with-bluetooth 			" >Atom-Based Asus Eee PC 901 Ships June 3 With Bluetooth [Rumor]   			</a><br /><body>
<div>
<div>
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/05/eeepc901s.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="494" height="464"  style="display:block;float:none;display:block;float:none;"/>Digitimes is reporting that the Atom-based Asus Eee PC 901 that we got a <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://gizmodo.com/390557/asus-eee-pc-901-images-show-new-refinements-possibly-atom-motherboard">peek at the other day</a> is set to ship on June 3. And it looks like the cosmetic enhancements (like the metal accents) aren&#8217;t the only bit of newness on board: Apparently, it&#8217;s got Bluetooth, and the Linux version will come with some new software. Otherwise, the guts are supposedly the same as the 900, and it&#8217;ll go for somewhere under $650. Hopefully way under that. [<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20080516PD210.html">Digitimes</a>]</p>
</p></div>
</p></div>
<p> </body>  <br style="clear: both;"/>   <img alt="" style="border: 0; height:1px; width:1px;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?i=dd8fe72a00b096b50a04ad0fc7ba0295" height="1" width="1"/> <img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=dd8fe72a00b096b50a04ad0fc7ba0295" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>
<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~a/gizmodo/full?a=BVg3Mx"><img src="http://feeds.gawker.com/~a/gizmodo/full?i=BVg3Mx" border="0"></img></a></p>
<div class="feedflare"> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?a=9f6viH"><img src="http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?i=9f6viH" border="0"></img></a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?a=y7ynvH"><img src="http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?i=y7ynvH" border="0"></img></a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?a=zpuMUh"><img src="http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?i=zpuMUh" border="0"></img></a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?a=6HxeXh"><img src="http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?i=6HxeXh" border="0"></img></a> </div>
<p><img src="http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~4/291661045" height="1" width="1"/>  			</p>
<p class="akst_link"><a href="http://www.intechnews.com/?p=19158&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_19158" class="akst_share_link" rel="nofollow">Share This</a>
</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intechnews.com/2008/05/16/atom-based-asus-eee-pc-901-ships-june-3-with-bluetooth-rumor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pick Headphones Straight From the Tree: It&#8217;s Even Weirder Than It Sounds [Gadgets]</title>
		<link>http://www.intechnews.com/2008/05/16/pick-headphones-straight-from-the-tree-its-even-weirder-than-it-sounds-gadgets/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intechnews.com/2008/05/16/pick-headphones-straight-from-the-tree-its-even-weirder-than-it-sounds-gadgets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 10:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intechnews.com/2008/05/16/pick-headphones-straight-from-the-tree-its-even-weirder-than-it-sounds-gadgets/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pick Headphones Straight From the Tree: It&#8217;s Even Weirder Than It Sounds [Gadgets]   			
For artist Alex Metcalf, the inner workings of trees has been a lifelong obsession. So, after he graduated from design school he utilized his artistic skills to create the &#8220;Tree Listening Installation&#8221;&#8212;a project designed to educate the public about what [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~3/291243451/pick-headphones-straight-from-the-tree-its-even-weirder-than-it-sounds 			" >Pick Headphones Straight From the Tree: It&#8217;s Even Weirder Than It Sounds [Gadgets]   			</a>
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/05/tree-listening.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="494" height="329"  style="display:block;float:none;display:block;float:none;"/>For artist Alex Metcalf, the inner workings of trees has been a lifelong obsession. So, after he graduated from design school he utilized his artistic skills to create the &#8220;Tree Listening Installation&#8221;&mdash;a project designed to educate the public about what happens inside a tree. The system he created allows visitors to listen to a live performance of a tree sucking up nutrients using either a simple metal cone that looks like an old-timey hearing aid, or a set of headphones linked to a specially designed solar powered sensor placed on the tree.</p>
<p>Using these devices, visitors are treated to a clicking sound indicating water being pulled up from the roots to the leaves through the xylem tube. If this sounds like some weird hippie crap to you, I definitely hear that. However, I can appreciate Metcalf&#8217;s unique artistic approach. Plus, it does represent an interesting way to fuse nature and technology. The Tree Listening Installation is currently on exhibit at the Royal Botanical Gardens just outside of London. [<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.alexmetcalf.co.uk/AlexMetcalf/Tree_Listening.html">Alex Metcalf</a> via <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://oddstrument.com/2008/05/14/tree-listeners-hear-trees-drinking/">Oddinstrument</a> via <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.coolbuzz.org/entry/how-about-hearing-some-treetalk/">Coolbuzz</a>]</p>
<p>   <br style="clear: both;"/>   <img alt="" style="border: 0; height:1px; width:1px;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?i=1e01e6e44f188e778f6f7ebbab6de527" height="1" width="1"/> <img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=1e01e6e44f188e778f6f7ebbab6de527" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>
<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~a/gizmodo/full?a=7kmjlM"><img src="http://feeds.gawker.com/~a/gizmodo/full?i=7kmjlM" border="0"></img></a></p>
<div class="feedflare"> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?a=0M1yIH"><img src="http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?i=0M1yIH" border="0"></img></a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?a=Jj3xLH"><img src="http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?i=Jj3xLH" border="0"></img></a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?a=9WE9wh"><img src="http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?i=9WE9wh" border="0"></img></a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?a=aLm9Hh"><img src="http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?i=aLm9Hh" border="0"></img></a> </div>
<p><img src="http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~4/291243451" height="1" width="1"/>  			</p>
<p class="akst_link"><a href="http://www.intechnews.com/?p=19157&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_19157" class="akst_share_link" rel="nofollow">Share This</a>
</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intechnews.com/2008/05/16/pick-headphones-straight-from-the-tree-its-even-weirder-than-it-sounds-gadgets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Went Wrong With the First TV Remotes [Retromodo]</title>
		<link>http://www.intechnews.com/2008/05/16/what-went-wrong-with-the-first-tv-remotes-retromodo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intechnews.com/2008/05/16/what-went-wrong-with-the-first-tv-remotes-retromodo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 09:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Technology News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intechnews.com/2008/05/16/what-went-wrong-with-the-first-tv-remotes-retromodo/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What Went Wrong With the First TV Remotes [Retromodo]   			
Zenith pioneered the TV remote control, but those early models were more drag than advantage. Electronic House has a full walk down remote-control memory lane, but first, here&#8217;s a quick Retromodo look at Zenith&#8217;s first three creative attempts&#8212;and what was tragically wrong with them: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~3/291022540/what-went-wrong-with-the-first-tv-remotes 			" >What Went Wrong With the First TV Remotes [Retromodo]   			</a>
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/05/Zenith_Remotes.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="494" height="110"  style="display:block;float:none;display:block;float:none;"/>Zenith pioneered the TV remote control, but those early models were more drag than advantage. Electronic House has a full walk down remote-control memory lane, but first, here&#8217;s a quick Retromodo look at Zenith&#8217;s first three creative attempts&mdash;and what was tragically wrong with them: <script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"> galleryPost(\'ZenithFirstRemotes\', 3, \'\'); </script></p>
<p>Lazy Bones (1950) - According to Electronic House, it was the world&#8217;s first commercially available TV remote control. It could only flip through channels by triggering a motorized knob. Needless to say, its secondary skill as a tripwire caused problems in the living room.</p>
<p>Flash-Matic (1955) - Billed as &#8220;absolutely harmless to humans,&#8221; this focused flashlight could be aimed at one of four light sensors on the TV itself, in order to turn TV on or off, change channel or adjust volume. But like Gyration mice and other gestural devices of today, it was a challenge because people forgot where and how to point the thing to activate each function. Also, sunlight really played havoc with the sensors.</p>
<p>Space Command (1956) - A much better system than Flash-Matic and as comfortable as a pack of Benson &#038; Hedges in the hand, the Space Command used ultrasound&mdash;ingeniously generated without batteries by plungers hitting aluminum tuning forks&mdash;to change channel, turn TV on or off, and adjust volume. It did have one problem, though: Some dogs couldn&#8217;t stand the noise.</p>
<p>Check out EH&#8217;s &#8220;A History of TV Remote Controls&#8221; for the full story. [<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.electronichouse.com/article/a_history_of_tv_remote_controls/">Electronic House</a>]</p>
<p>   <br style="clear: both;"/>       <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=2d6ede905674ee036e4ab0adaa5a23e1"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=2d6ede905674ee036e4ab0adaa5a23e1"/></a>   <img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=2d6ede905674ee036e4ab0adaa5a23e1" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>
<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~a/gizmodo/full?a=tnYL2X"><img src="http://feeds.gawker.com/~a/gizmodo/full?i=tnYL2X" border="0"></img></a></p>
<div class="feedflare"> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?a=QAzFiH"><img src="http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?i=QAzFiH" border="0"></img></a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?a=YIipjH"><img src="http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?i=YIipjH" border="0"></img></a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?a=HTTjPh"><img src="http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?i=HTTjPh" border="0"></img></a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?a=TqPQph"><img src="http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?i=TqPQph" border="0"></img></a> </div>
<p><img src="http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~4/291022540" height="1" width="1"/>  			</p>
<p class="akst_link"><a href="http://www.intechnews.com/?p=19156&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_19156" class="akst_share_link" rel="nofollow">Share This</a>
</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intechnews.com/2008/05/16/what-went-wrong-with-the-first-tv-remotes-retromodo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
